<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bits and Pieces</title>
	<link>http://davisdesigncorp.com/wordpress/2008/03/08/bits-and-pieces/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://davisdesigncorp.com/wordpress/2008/03/08/bits-and-pieces/#comment-146</link>
		<author>Carrie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davisdesigncorp.com/wordpress/2008/03/08/bits-and-pieces/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I can understand where that artist is coming from in stating that: "when you look at the whole in an effort to see everything, you see nothing" - I think that it's best to take it all in and make a mental note every little thing that makes up that one specific phenomenon. Whether it's just looking into the sunset or looking at a painting. You need to break it down and simplify it to understand it or form your own theory and to appreciate it. 
I have to admit though, sometimes I just take things as they come and don't give it much thought but sometimes I also break things down and try to take in as much in as possible. 
For example, when I look at a painting; I wonder what the person was thinking when creating that piece of art, what made them paint, draw or shape that, what music they might have had on, if any. I observe the color(s), the shape(s), the little details. However, even by doing that, I am not able to truly ascertain everything. I also think it would be nice to fully dedicate myself into one specific thing and break it down into it's most simplest form until there's nothing left to learn. I don't think I have the genetic make up to be able to preform such a arduous task though. 
So whether I look at something as a whole or look at it in detail - I'd like to believe that as long as you're appreciating it...you're not missing out on much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand where that artist is coming from in stating that: &#8220;when you look at the whole in an effort to see everything, you see nothing&#8221; - I think that it&#8217;s best to take it all in and make a mental note every little thing that makes up that one specific phenomenon. Whether it&#8217;s just looking into the sunset or looking at a painting. You need to break it down and simplify it to understand it or form your own theory and to appreciate it.<br />
I have to admit though, sometimes I just take things as they come and don&#8217;t give it much thought but sometimes I also break things down and try to take in as much in as possible.<br />
For example, when I look at a painting; I wonder what the person was thinking when creating that piece of art, what made them paint, draw or shape that, what music they might have had on, if any. I observe the color(s), the shape(s), the little details. However, even by doing that, I am not able to truly ascertain everything. I also think it would be nice to fully dedicate myself into one specific thing and break it down into it&#8217;s most simplest form until there&#8217;s nothing left to learn. I don&#8217;t think I have the genetic make up to be able to preform such a arduous task though.<br />
So whether I look at something as a whole or look at it in detail - I&#8217;d like to believe that as long as you&#8217;re appreciating it&#8230;you&#8217;re not missing out on much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
